Quick Chek Plan Pushed to Zoning Board

Township committee rejects drafting ordinance to allow gas stations at Route 202, Changebridge Road intersection.

After more than two hours of public discussion on the topic Tuesday, the voted 3 to 2 against creating an ordinance that would amend the permitted land use at the intersection of Changebridge Road and Route 202.

If passed, the purpose to allow gas stations to be developed on the property would have benefitted property owner William O'Dowd's intentions to develop a Quick Chek mega gas station and convenience store at the site. If O'Dowd wishes to proceed with the project, he will have to face the Zoning Board of Adjustment to discuss conditional uses or variances for the property.

While a few residents who spoke were in favor of a Quick Chek at that location, the majority of those who spoke were against the development for fear of traffic congestion and danger of placing a gas station close to power lines. The majority of residents who spoke live in the Changebridge at Montville association.

O'Dowd's attorney, George Kroculick, prepared a presentation for the township committee and invited licensed planning consultant Peter Steck to speak to O'Dowd's intentions and how he felt the development would benefit the township. Steck spoke about the township's Master Plan, which was re-developed over the course of two years, and said that while there was pressure to complete the document, the township should consider making some changes.

In the Master Plan, Steck said, there are several suggested and allowed uses for the zone in question, including galleries, antique shops, clothing stores, shoe stores, cleaners and hardware stores. Some of the bigger allowances are for drugstores and even grocery stores, depending on the size. But what is not permitted, according to the Master Plan as written, are gas stations-a land use allowance imperative to O'Dowd's development plan moving forward.

O'Dowd owns 4.7 acres of land where Changebridge Road and Route 202 meet. Admittedly, O'Dowd knew gas stations were not permitted in the zone when he purchased the land, but, according to his representatives, he has been seeking to have the land use permissions changed for several years.

Steck argued that the way the Master Plan is written, there are not many incentives included for a developer in the zone and there are, in fact, deterrants. One of which is that a developer would need to build a road that would provide rear access to all of the lots in the section, which include the . Steck said this is a condition that cannot be met by developers who cannot afford to complete the road. 

But O'Dowd believes Quick Chek would fund the roadway, which Steck estimated would be worth $1 million, as the company sees potential in creating a store at that location. Additionally, Steck said Quick Chek may fund a traffic light at the intersection. Some residents considered the project a gift to the township.

"I see this as a $1 million gift and a safety factor that's well-deserved for the residents of Montville," one said.

Steck said the Master Plan should encourage development, like this, in the township.

"The whole purpose of this is to create mechanisms to get something constructed," he said.

Other benefits of the development of the project, he said, include adding a ratable to the township's tax base and creating competition amongst gas stations offering the cheapest gas. But competition became an issue of contention with the project after Steck implied that the cheaper Quick Chek gas could affect , located across the street, business.

"This is America, you get to compete," he said.

One resident noted that the competition could drive Exxon away from Changebridge Road, causing the township to then lose a ratable.

Steve Sammit, a Changebridge at Montville resident, was concerned about the potential for increased traffic at the intersection that could come with cheaper gas.

"You're selling cheap gas on an exit of (Route) 287 where you have a north and south exit to come into. It's like a goldmine," he said.

Marcia Lederman called Quick Chek a "monstrosity" and opposed the project because she said the mega gas station and convenience store would take away from the character of the community.

"I think to bring in the monstrosity like the Quick Chek would not only do a disservice to the people of Changebridge at Montville, but a disservice to the people of the township itself," she said.

But, in responding to the comments, O'Dowd said he does not feel a Quick Chek would cause more traffic probelms.

"I contend that our development is not going to change (traffic) in a meaningful manner," he said, adding later, "I don't believe the traffic on (Route) 202 is as bad as you're making it."

Residents were also concerned about the power lines that run adjacent to both sides of the property. Sammit referenced an explosion in 1994 in Edison where a gas station was developed over power lines.

"You're putting in a match that's going to the light the bomb," he said.

Planning Board Vice Chairman Gary Lewis said the board denied O'Dowd's application for the Quick Chek development three times and that the township committee should not amend the land use in the zone to conform to his development plans as there are other appropriate uses on the property.

"A service station and convenience store is not the only option for this site. Do not be fooled," he said.

He also asked that the township committee not weigh their decision entirely on the prospect of the road being funded.

"Don't sell this community out for a road for $1 million," he said.

In her remarks, Township Committeewoman Deborah Nielson said she has already had conversations with county representatives who have said they will work to help the township receive funding to aid with the construction of the road, regardless of what is developed there. Nielson said she felt that O'Dowd's presentation before the township committee was an effort to receive more support before returning to the Planning Board.

"He lobbied us individually and collectively," she said.

Nielson also said that while allowing the Quick Check development to move forward would bring a new ratable to the township, the township needed "the right ratables." She referenced the land use allowances on Route 46, where gas stations and adult book stores are both permitted.

"If we're chasing ratables, we should put an adult book store there. I'm sure we'll get a lot of customers," she said.

Committeeman Scott Gallopo said before the presentation that he did not feel it was right that the committee was presented the information without time to review materials in advance before being asked to make a decision. He did, however, comment on the current traffic conditions in that area.

"This intersection, currently, is a nightmare for traffic," he said.

Gallopo said he was interested in hearing about the potential traffic effects from experts before the committee made a decision either way on amending the ordinance. He recommended a separate public hearing be held after traffic studies are conducted.

However, Mayor Tim Braden questioned Township Attorney James Bryce on whether the committee could allow traffic studies on a development project that does not currently have an application in with one of the township's land use boards. Bryce advised that the township committee would need to approve a motion to draft an ordinance that would ammend the land use permissions in the zone and then hold a public hearing where the traffic studies could be discussed. Committeeman Jim Sandham made that motion.

"I'd like to understand what the traffic impact is," he said.

Sandham also said that while he respects the opinions of the residents, he felt that O'Dowd's interests should also be considered.

"I think that a person's entitled to develop their property," he said.

Braden felt that the issue would be better handled by the land use boards becasue they are "a-political."

"We are a political body," he said. "Sometimes, some people in our position may put their fingers up to the wind and see which way it's blowing."

Braden, Nielson and Gallopo voted against drafting the ordinance while Sandham and Committeeman Don Kostka voted for it.

Ted April 04, 2012 at 04:21 AM
Art, I'm surprised (I think) that you would consider my comment is from bitterness. This applicant, who is a respectable businessman, has attempted to get this zoning change done many times & many different ways. It appears that the plan isn't a favorite to many different groups, both in & out of government & this last move was an attempt (failed) to circumvent the process, & and was led by Mr. Sandham & company. I won't even go into your issues with your property & the realignment of 202. My comment was to remind that there are folks watching what happens in town, and contrary to the thoughts of many elected officials, people notice these things. Jim has every right to have lunch with Mr. O'Dowd, but it looks suspect when Jim moves a motion that would benefit the applicant/friend. He should have recused himself in the matter. Oh, and Mr. Kostka's campaign rec'd $550 from him, so there's another committeeman that should have recused himself!
art daughtry April 04, 2012 at 11:58 AM
Hi Ted - I'm glad you responded and you state there was no bitterness on your part and that your views are based on your understanding of what the citizens do not want on that site. I'll offer you some counter points to consider. The only group of voters that are against the gas station are the voters in ChangeBridge at Montville. The crazy part to this is they stand to benefit the most if both bypass roads could be built. So please enlighten us if there are other groups that believe a gas station on that site, with proper roads, is not in the citizen's best interests and add tax dollars. As far as the friends point Mr. Sandham, Mayor Braden, and myself all are in Kiwanis and have worked side by side with Bill and Joe O'Dowd for over 30 years. As far as myself of course he is a good friend but when the man is right he is just that. The games about this gas station have very little to do with reality. Bill, in my opinion, shouldn't have tried the end around with the TC as you say. It might be a legal move. If you want to talk about TC members recusing themselves there is a much larger one that should come out soon with the marketplace open space land sale. Do you still need the water bug? I'm back in NJ late April. Regards, Your token friend, Art
art daughtry April 04, 2012 at 12:14 PM
Hi Dan I never consider at face value any traffic study done for a developer and paid for by a developer. Please tell me just one case where a traffic study indicated the applicant that paid for the study couldn't build? I was referring to unbiased complete traffic studys by the county on their road. It was back in the mid 80's and there is plenty of good info in that one and the 2007 study. Mike Lahue did a great job with that site cleaning it up and he did the best he could with the traffic flow but I wonder what the citizens would think if you asked them about getting into and out of his property (2 Changebridge Road). No Dan you and JR didn't do everything wrong and, like all of us, we gravitate to our accomplishments like your example of the public safety building property. However that TC spent money like drunkin sailors with unbeilevable cost overruns of 300% and doubled township debt. We both know all of this is old news. As you say "you have to believe in your own BS". How's the digging going? Regards, Art
Dan Grant April 04, 2012 at 03:01 PM
Art, If memory serves the County was involved in that traffic study and infact developed the plan for the Roadway and planned to contribute to it. The property owner had an interested party which as I remember was a CVS or some kind of Drug Store but that fell through. I really don't want to go back into the history of our debt because we were coming from a place of no progress on either rec facilities, a library, a public safety building, a senior house and hundreds of acres of open-space that stopped 350 homes from being built which would have created the need for an additional school. This Township would not have gotten a AAA bond rating if A) the people where not able to pay the taxes and we didn't have a workable method of paying down the debt which the Rating Companies did NOT see as excessive. If anything your "Former" team had nothing to do with it except take the credit for other peoples work. Some of my digging is in the hands of Patch and we will see what they do with it. I have now also learned that the Township Lawyer and the County Lawyer had private discussions about how Montville could avoid paying the 25 percent that they were supposed to pay on this grant. Interesting.
Ted April 06, 2012 at 02:26 AM
Art: Yes. C U then.


More »
Got a question? Something on your mind? Talk to your community, directly.
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors.What's on your mind?What's on your mind?Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell somethingPost something
See more »